Question
Answered step-by-step
CountTapir2143
Hi, I did this text and I would like to know is correct and ask…
Hi, I did this text and I would like to know is correct and ask help for make better .
This text need to be a Critically discuss
Can we exist as individuals outside other people’s influence?
The answer to this question is both yes and no. On one hand, it is possible to exist as an individual free of the influence of others. We may choose to be self-sufficient and make our own choices without being persuaded by the ideas or beliefs of others. We each have our own set of views, beliefs, and values that derive from our own upbringings, experiences, and life choices. On the other hand, the influence of others may have a significant effect on how we behave. People we connect with, the environment in which we live, and social pressure may all shape and affect our behavior in subtle and sometimes strong ways.
Social Psychology -The study of how an individual’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are influenced by the actual, imagined, or symbolically represented presence of other people, according to Gordon W. Allport (APA Dictionary).
Social Influence – any alteration in a person’s ideas, feelings, or behaviors brought on by other peoplewhether those people are actually there or just impliedly present in their presence or not. Interpersonal dynamics that have the power to alter people’s attitudes, emotions, or actions (APA Dictionary).
Conformity – the modification of one’s beliefs, decisions, or behaviors to make them more compatible with the beliefs, decisions, or actions of others or the accepted norms of a social group or circumstance. Compliant behavior comprises both more substantial and long-lasting private acceptance (APA Dictionary).
Social influence can be studied through different approaches, such as the foot-in-the-door technique, door-in-the-face technique, and conformity. The foot-in-the-door technique refers to the idea that people are more likely to comply with a request if they have first agreed to a smaller request. This is based on the assumption that the subject will now feel obligated to comply with the larger request due to the norm of reciprocity. The door-in-the-face technique works by changing the order of the requests, so that a large request is made first and then a smaller request is made. This is seen as a way of increasing compliance with the small request as the requestor is seen as making a concession in shifting from the large request to the small one. Conformity, meanwhile, refers to the social impact that results from following established norms.
Experiments by Sherif (1966) have shown that people’s judgements can be impacted by social forces. Using the autokinetic effect, Sherif requested that participants calculate the distance that the point of light travelled. Individually and in groups of two or three persons were the two options. Others were assessed in groups first, then individually, while some participants were tested individually first, then in groups. There was a lot of variety in the judgements made by individuals who were initially assessed individually. However, the judgements converged across a number of trials when these same participants were then evaluated in groups of two or three and had to yell out their estimates so that other group members could hear.
In addition, Milgram’s (1963, 1974) studies of obedience have revealed that people are prone to obeying authority, although it is not always required. The 40 male volunteers in the best known version of Stanley Milgram’s experiment were told that the main focus of the study was the connection between punishment, learning and memory. The experiment came to an end when participants either refused to comply with the experimenter’s request or delivered the learner the machine’s maximum amount of shock (450 volts). Milgram discovered that participants’ compliance with the researcher was surprisingly high: 65% of them gave the learner the 450-volt shock. Not all subjects complied with the experimenter’s instructions, which is significant since Milgram’s experiments illuminated the elements that give some people the courage to defy authority.
The issue of how other individuals might influence our behavior also touches on the idea of obedience. This is due to the fact that when someone in a position of authority asks us to do something, we may be more inclined to comply than if the same request came from a person who did not hold that position of authority. This is due to the fact that we are more inclined to believe someone in a position of authority is more likely to be correct. This is particularly valid if the figurehead is someone we respect, like a parent, teacher, or employer.
Allport, Social Facilitation (1920). Allport developed the idea that certain behaviors can be facilitated by the presence of others (the social group). It was discovered that an audience would enhance an actor’s performance in well-learned/easy activities, but that social inhibition would cause an actor to perform less well in newly learned/difficult tasks.
Bandura’s Social Learning Theory from 1963. Bandura first proposed the idea that social behavior may be modelled. In a video that was shown to three different groups of kids, an adult was shown acting violently toward a “bobo doll” and either got away with it, received praise from another adult, or received punishment. Children were found to be more likely to copy an adult’s behavior if they had witnessed the adult being rewarded.
Weiner, Attribution Theory (1986). Weiner established the notion that we look for explanations of behavior in the social realm and was concerned in the attributions made for experiences of success and failure. He thought that these decisions were based on three criteria: controllability, stability, and locus, which can be either internal or external.
In conclusion, although it is possible to live as an individual free of the impact of others, it is sometimes impossible to totally ignore the effect of others around us. We may be able to make our own choices and follow our own paths, but we cannot deny the influence of others around us. Ultimately, it is up to us to determine how we will act, and we have the option to disregard the thoughts and beliefs of others around us and make our own judgments.
In general, it is conceivable for humans to exist independently of other people. This is due to the fact that everyone of us has an inherent sense of self-determination and free will that enables us to act and make decisions independently, even if those actions are sometimes impacted by other forces. We can stay true to ourselves and our own beliefs by comprehending our unique needs and values, developing our own opinions, engaging in activities that are meaningful to us, and maintaining high self-esteem.
Psychology has done a great deal of research on the premise that other people may influence our behavior, notably in the area of social psychology. This is so because our interactions with and responses to other people directly affect how
