Question
Answered step-by-step
shaaquellcharles34
Can you help me clarify my research problem statement? How do…
Can you help me clarify my research problem statement?
How do these articles relate to my study?
Please help me clarify my research question and testable hypothesis?
The scientific method is a systematic technique for gaining knowledge of the natural world. Analysis, testing, and observation make up the three stages of this process. As we look at the data, we can decide whether the hypothesis is correct. The scientific method enables us to learn about and have a better understanding of the workings of the cosmos. With the information that we currently have, we can build solutions that will improve not just the environment but also the quality of our lives. Science is not built on opinions or sentiments; rather, it is based on facts and concepts that can be backed up by evidence and are verified via experiments (Mayer, 2020). People’s life experiences may sometimes be better understood through the lens of astrology. Many people think that astrological readings, particularly their own, explain a lot of their experiences (Allum, 2011). Since it often makes use of unstructured and irrational approaches to data analysis, the accuracy of astrology may be difficult to judge. Without a standard of comparison, such as a control group, confirming the reliability of astrology is an exercise in futility (Chico & Lorenzo-Seva, 2006).
Allum, N. (2011). What Makes Some People Think Astrology Is Scientific? Science Communication, 33(3), 341-366.
The author investigates the several variables that lead to people’s belief in astrology in his article titled “The Factors That Contribute to People’s Belief in Astrology,” which focuses on the various aspects that impact people’s astrological views. The author examines not only the positions taken by scientists about astrology; but also, the factors that persuade some people to hold that belief despite the lack of hard evidence. Those who believe in astrology are more likely to have lower levels of education, less of an interest in topics linked to science, and be more likely to have had negative events occur in their life, according to the findings of the research. Although there is no scientific evidence to back up astrology, this article explores the reasons why some people still have that view. The author investigates how a person’s mind, social life, and culture can affect whether they believe in astrology. These components might consist of the following: the article’s lack of focus on a specific demographic or group of individuals shows a potential flaw in the body of current research; It could be interesting to investigate if certain demographic groupslike the deeply religious or those with lower levels of educationhave a higher propensity to believe in astrology.
Andersson, I., Persson, J., & Kajonius, P. (2022). Even the stars think that I am superior: Personality, intelligence, and belief in astrology. Personality and Individual Differences, 187.
The authors look at how a person’s personality, intelligence, and beliefs about astrology are all connected. According to the results of this study, those who have a strong belief in astrology also tend to have lower scores on tests that show intelligence and openness to new experiences. This is the case even when these tests were given to the same people. The study also showed that those who believe in astrology tend to have higher scores on measures of neuroticism and agreeableness than those who do not believe in astrology. This study examines whether a person’s personality, intellectual ability, and astrological views are related. The surprising thing that the authors found was that people with certain personality traits, like being open to new experiences, were more likely to believe in astrology. They also concluded that intelligence had nothing to do with whether someone believed in astrology. Since the study was done in Sweden, it is likely that the results do not apply to the lives of people in other countries and cultures. This shows room for improvement in the already available body of research. It would be interesting to find out if these findings hold true in other countries where the cultural norms and values differ.
Chico, E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2006). Belief in Astrology Inventory: Development and validation. Psychological Reports, 99(3), 851-863.
Chico and Lorenzo-Seva developed and tested the Belief in Astrology Inventory (BAI) in 2006. The survey’s goal is to find out how strongly people believe that astrology can tell the future. The research shows that the Belief in Astrology Index (BAI) has an elevated level of reliability and validity, and it can be used to measure how much people from diverse groups believe in astrology. This article addresses the development and validation of the Belief in Astrology Inventory (BAI), which is a survey that assesses how much people believe in astrology. The researchers found that the BAI was both valid and trustworthy, and they proved that it could be used to assess the extent to which individuals subscribe to astrological views. Since the article concentrates on the building of a measuring instrument rather than examining belief in astrology, there may be a gap in the current corpus of research as a result. The Belief in Astrology Inventory (BAI) may be used in future research to investigate the characteristics that influence astrological belief, or it may be used to compare the level of astrological belief held by different populations.
Crowe, R. A. (1990). Astrology and the scientific method. Psychological Reports, 67(1), 163-191
In Crowe (1990), the author explains the scientific method and how it might be applied to astrology. The author says that astrology does not meet the criteria for a scientific theory because it does not have any testable hypotheses, it cannot be disproven, and it does not have a clear theoretical framework. The results of the study show that astrology is not a scientific subject and should not be treated as one. This article supplies a detailed investigation and discussion of the scientific data that supports astrology. The author argues that astrology does not meet the standards of scientific methods and that the evidence supporting astrology is weak and conflicting. One of the probable reasons why there is a gap in the current body of research is that the publication is old (it was published in 1990) and may not reflect more recent studies on the issue. This is one of the reasons why there is a gap in the existing body of research. It would be remarkably interesting to find out whether more recent studies have produced added evidence for astrology or whether the scientific consensus supports that astrology is not a legitimate scientific theory. Both questions would be intriguing to learn the answers to.
Hamilton, M. (2001). Who believes in astrology? Effect of favorableness of astrologically derived personality descriptions on acceptance of astrology. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 895-902.
The author looks at how people’s views on astrology change depending on whether the personality descriptions based on astrology are positive. The results of this study show that people are more likely to believe in astrology if they are given positive astrological personality profiles based on their birth dates. According to the research, the fact that so many people believe in astrology may be at least partly due to something called the “Barnaby effect.” This is when people tend to believe that generalizations and vague statements about themselves are true. To better understand why some individuals, believe in astrology and others do not, this research sets out to find those characteristics. The author found that people were more likely to believe in astrology when they were told positive things about their astrological signs. There may be a gap in the research because this study only looked at how personality traits affect astrological faith. It did not look at things like culture or social norms that may also affect faith.
Kelly, I. W. (1998). Why astrology doesn’t work. Psychological Reports, 82(2), 527-546.
The author takes a psychological look at the subject and shows why astrology does not work. The author says that astrology is based on false ideas, such as the idea that the position of the planets in the sky at the time of a person’s birth can affect their personality and the things that happen in their life. The research showed that astrology is not a reliable way to predict or judge a person’s personality.
Lillqvist, O., & Lindeman, M. (1998). Belief in astrology as a strategy for self-verification and coping with negative life-events. European Psychologist, 3(3), 202-208. https://doi-org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.1027/1016-9040.3.3.202
In their 1998 study, Lillqvist and Lindeman look at how people use astrology to check their beliefs and deal with traumatic events in their lives. According to the research findings, those who believe in astrology are more likely to use the practice as a method for self-verification and a way to better deal with distressing occurrences in their lives. According to the findings of the research, having a strong belief in astrology might be helpful as a coping technique for certain people. The goal of this study was to find out if believing in astrology can be seen to check oneself and deal with hard things in life.
The researchers concluded that those who believed in astrology were more likely to see astrological predictions as correct and be satisfied with them if they fit with their self-concept. Also, people who reported a higher number of negative life events were more likely to believe in astrology. The study adds to our understanding of the psychological reasons for believing in astrology, yet it is limited in that it does not assess the accuracy of astrological predictions.
Mayer, G. (2020). Astrology and Science: A Precarious Relationship Part 2: Consideration of Empirical Investigations on the Validity of Astrology. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 34(4), 792-828. https://doi- org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.31275/20201697
Mayer (2020) investigates the empirical research that has been done on the legitimacy of astrology. The author says that there is no tangible evidence to back up what astrology says and that the studies that have been done are flawed or have produced contradictory results. Also, the author says that there is no tangible evidence to back up what astrology says it can do. According to the results of the study, astrology cannot be considered a scientific theory, and any claims in its favor should be taken with a grain of salt.
Sharing information, resources, and procedures; seeking guidance from a subject-matter expert; forming alliances with like-minded people; and collaborating on projects are common practices among researchers. Improvements in biomedicine, behavioral science, and social policy all depend on the collection, management, sharing, and ownership of relevant data. For an exceptionally long time, the American Psychiatric Association (2017) has pushed for safeguards to be put in place to ensure the safety of animals used in studies and the reliability of scientific findings. Everyone in an organization should serve as a mentor to at least one younger employee, and all employees should follow conventional standards including giving correct citations when using other people’s work and never plagiarizing. Research organizations have procedures in place to investigate allegations of misconduct and give their findings to the Office of Research Integrity (2017).
Some of the things that might affect astrological beliefs are personality traits, cognitive biases, and ways to deal with problems. On the other hand, if one takes a closer look at the research that has already been done, they will see that it has a few holes in it, which shows that further research is necessary (Andersson et al., 2022). For example, most research has focused on things that happen on an individual level. It has not investigated how social or cultural factors affect a person’s belief in astrology.
In addition, there is a dearth of studies on the reliability of astrological forecasts and the processes that are said to constitute the root of their beneficial effects. Because of this, doing more study is very necessary if we want to cut these gaps in our knowledge and get a deeper comprehension of the psychological and social aspects of astrology (Lillqvist & Lindeman. 1998).
It is possible that people who believe in astrology are less likely to trust scientific evidence and are more likely to question what science says. As the hypothesis goes, adherents of astrology are more likely to choose astrological explanations than scientific ones because of the widespread feeling of astrology as a pseudoscience (Hamilton, 2001). A poll or experiment might be conducted to find out how much confidence people have in astrology compared with how much they trust science. Participants might be questioned on their level of trust in science and their opinion of astrology as a valid method of knowledge acquisition.
If you ask those who believe in astrology and those who do not whether they think there is a significant difference in the two groups’ degrees of faith in science and dependency on scientific facts, you can see if there really is a difference by comparing their responses (Kelly, 1998). There have been several studies confirming this theory. According to the findings of Chico and Lorenzo-Seva (2006), for instance, people who scored higher on a self-reported evaluation of astrological belief were more likely to believe in astrology and had less confidence in science. Astrology claims to supply answers, but is it scientific? Does astrology have scientific support?
References
Allum, N. (2011). What Makes Some People Think Astrology Is Scientific? Science Communication, 33(3), 341-366.
Andersson, I., Persson, J., & Kajonius, P. (2022). Even the stars think that I am superior: Personality, intelligence, and belief in astrology. Personality and Individual Differences, 187.
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
Chico, E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2006). Belief in Astrology Inventory: Development and validation. Psychological Reports, 99(3), 851-863.
Crowe, R. A. (1990). Astrology and the scientific method. Psychological Reports, 67(1), 163-191
Hamilton, M. (2001). Who believes in astrology? Effect of favorableness of astrologically derived personality descriptions on acceptance of astrology. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 895-902.
Kelly, I. W. (1998). Why astrology doesn’t work. Psychological Reports, 82(2), 527-546.
Lillqvist, O., & Lindeman, M. (1998). Belief in astrology as a strategy for self-verification and coping with negative life-events. European Psychologist, 3(3), 202-208. https://doi-org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.1027/1016-9040.3.3.202
Mayer, G. (2020). Astrology and Science: A Precarious Relationship Part 2: Consideration of Empirical Investigations on the Validity of Astrology. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 34(4), 792-828. https://doi- org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.31275/20201697
