Question
Answered step-by-step
UltraExplorationNightingale49
Please revise paper below to APA format: The ability to…
Please revise paper below to APA format:
The ability to conduct quality research is crucial for any researcher, especially those pursuing a doctoral degree. The articles by Lindsay (2015), Lee, Chang, and Bryan (2020), and Klocko, Marshal, and Davidson (2015) each highlight different skills required for effective research. This paper synthesizes the key themes presented in the articles and provides evidence to support these themes. The paper concludes by summarizing the main points of the three themes and making recommendations for future research on the topic. Effective research skills require a combination of technical proficiency, critical thinking, and creativity.
The first theme common to all three articles is the importance of technical proficiency in conducting quality research. Lindsay (2015) emphasizes the importance of computer skills in managing and analyzing data, while Klocko et al. (2015) stress the need for proficiency in statistical analysis. Lee et al. (2020) argue that the use of technology, such as online surveys, can help researchers gather data more efficiently. Technical proficiency refers to the ability to use the necessary tools and technologies to collect, manage, analyze, and present data. This theme is supported by evidence from all three articles, which highlight the importance of skills such as database management, programming, use of statistical software, and online surveys. The paper presents evidence from each article to support this theme, such as Lindsay’s (2015) emphasis on computer skills, Klocko et al.’s (2015) emphasis on statistical knowledge, and Lee et al.’s (2020) discussion of the use of technology in data collection. For instance, Lindsay (2015) highlights the importance of skills such as database management, programming, and use of statistical software, while Klocko et al. (2015) stress the importance of statistical knowledge in data analysis. Lee et al. (2020) point out that using technology, such as online surveys, can save time and resources.
The second common theme in the articles is the need for critical thinking skills in conducting quality research. Lindsay (2015) argues that researchers need to be able to critically evaluate the quality of sources and determine their relevance to the research question. Klocko et al. (2015) emphasizes the importance of formulating clear research questions and hypotheses, while Lee et al. (2020) discuss the importance of critically analyzing data to draw accurate conclusions. Critical thinking refers to the ability to evaluate evidence, arguments, and claims in a systematic and logical way. This theme is supported by evidence from all three articles, which emphasize the importance of critical evaluation of sources, clear research questions and hypotheses, and accurate data analysis. The paper presents evidence from each article to support this theme, such as Lindsay’s (2015) emphasis on critical evaluation of sources, Klocko et al.’s (2015) emphasis on formulating clear research questions and hypotheses, and Lee et al.’s (2020) discussion of critical data analysis. For instance, Lindsay (2015) highlights the importance of critical evaluation of sources to ensure the credibility and accuracy of data. Klocko et al. (2015) stress the importance of clear research questions and hypotheses to guide the research process. Lee et al. (2020) point out that critical analysis of data is crucial to ensure the accuracy and validity of research findings.
The third common theme is the need for creativity in conducting research. Lindsay (2015) argues that researchers need to be creative in designing research studies that can answer complex questions. Klocko et al. (2015) emphasizes the need for creativity in selecting and adapting research methods to fit the research question. Lee et al. (2020) point out that researchers need to be creative in designing data collection instruments that can capture the complexity of human experiences. Creativity refers to the ability to generate new and innovative ideas and to think outside the box. This theme is supported by evidence from all three articles, which emphasize the importance of creativity in designing research studies and data collection instruments. The paper presents evidence from each article to support this theme, such as Lindsay’s (2015) emphasis on creative research design, Klocko et al.’s (2015) emphasis on selecting and adapting research methods, and Lee et al.’s (2020) discussion of the complexity of human experiences.
For instance, Lindsay (2015) highlights the importance of creativity in designing research studies that can answer complex questions. Klocko et al. (2015) stress the importance of creativity in selecting and adapting research methods to fit the research question. Lee et al. (2020) point out that creativity is essential in designing data collection instruments that can capture the complexity of human experiences.
In conclusion, the three articles by Lindsay (2015), Lee et al. (2020), and Klocko et al. (2015) highlight the importance of technical proficiency, critical thinking, and creativity in conducting quality research. Technical proficiency is essential in managing and analyzing data, critical thinking is required to evaluate sources and draw accurate conclusions, while creativity is necessary in designing research studies and data collection instruments. To be an effective researcher, one needs to possess a combination of these skills. Future research should explore how these skills can be integrated into doctoral programs to better prepare researchers for conducting quality research. The synthesis paper provides a comprehensive overview of the skills required for effective research, using evidence from the articles by Lindsay (2015), Lee et al. (2020), and Klocko et al. (2015) to support the three themes of technical proficiency, critical thinking, and creativity. By summarizing the three themes and highlighting the importance of technical proficiency, critical thinking, and creativity in conducting quality research. The paper emphasizes that these skills are interrelated, and that effective research requires a combination of these skills. The paper also recommends that future research should explore how these skills can be integrated into doctoral programs to better prepare researchers for conducting quality research.
References:
Klocko, B. A., Marshal, S. M., & Davidson, J. F. (2015). Developing practioner-scholar doctoral candidates as critical writers. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 15(4). 21-31. http://www.na-businesspress.com/JHETP/KlockoBA_Web15_4_.pdf
Lee, H., Chang, H., & Bryan, L. (2020). Doctoral students’ learning success in online-based leadership programs: Intersection with technological and relational factors. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4462
Lindsay, S. (2015). What works for doctoral students in completing their thesis? Teaching in Higher Education, 20(2). 183-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.974025
