Summary Section For this section of the paper, you will address the…

judithisidoro03Summary Section For this section of the paper, you will address the…Summary SectionFor this section of the paper, you will address the following:Participants: who was in the study?Focus on the important details only- it is not only unnecessary to describe the exact demographics of the participants, it is distracting! Tell me the number of participants, as well as the age range. However, when explaining gender/sex, ethnicity, and other important factors, do so in a general summary- do not present all the numbers and percentages for every demographic! Instead, give me the “big picture” of who the participants were: For example, you might say, “the 6th graders were mostly Hispanic/Latinx, with around 20% Caucasian.”   When deciding what demographics to discuss, consider whether they are an important part of the study or if they would influence the results in any meaningful way. Most cognitive research focuses on the normal population, and it will be assumed that this is the case for your chosen study*.  Image transcription textLaw Hum Behav (2010) 34:367-378 DOI10.1007/s10979-009-9204-x ORIGINAL ARTICLE NowEveryone Looks the Same: Alcohol Intoxication Reduc… Show more… Show moreImage transcription text368 Law Hum Behav (2010) 34:367-378 the environment(Denson et al., 2008; Giancola & Corman, policeinvestigation. However, without knowing whether 200… Show more… Show moreImage transcription textLaw Hum Behav (2010) 34:367-378 369 recognition of thesefaces will also develop (see Hills & perceptual-expertise or asocial-categorization framework Lewis, 2006; Michel … Show more… Show moreImage transcription text370 they wottld be receiving alcohol. Participants in the alcoholcondition were given 2.42 ml ol’vodka (37.5% alcohol) for everykilogram of lean body mass. This was divided between … Show more… Show moreImage transcription text’-.-‘:~’:-L’ii.’.i||2′ u.”.. -I .- ….’ Law Hum Behav (20l0)341367—378 the conclusion of the experiment); had alreadydone a similar face recognition task; reported any card… Show more… Show moreImage transcription text372 Law Hum Behav (2010) 34:367-378 of intoxication did notsignificantly differ from those given 0.9 by the Europeanparticipants in either the alcohol condition Asian faces… Show more… Show moreImage transcription textLaw Hutu Bchav (20H!) 34z??T—378 0.38 – 0.86- I Same-racefaces Different-race faces 0.84 – 0.32 ‘- 03 4 0.?8 – Recognitionaccuracy (A) 0.?6 ‘ 0.14 Alcohol Placebo Alcohol Status… Show more… Show moreImage transcription text374 Law Hum Behav (2010) 34:367-378 Table 1 Means (andstandard deviations) for participants’ recognition performancefor same-race (SR) and different-race (DR) faces as a f… Show more… Show moreImage transcription textLaw Hutu Behav (leltll 34:3b7u378 intoxication is largelydisrupting participants’ usually expert perceptual processing ofsame—race faces. whereas participants’ relatively poo… Show more… Show more Image transcription text376 Law Hum Behav (2010) 34:367-378 to the legal profession,but we suggest that these pre- levels of alcohol intoxicationindicates the stability and liminary results are sufficien… Show more… Show more Social SciencePsychology