ColonelExploration10183THE KLINES: Family with a son in trouble Assume that a person in…THE KLINES: Family with a son in troubleAssume that a person in the agency where you work has done an intake interview and that you are given the following information:The Kline family consists of Gail and George, their two daughters, Jessie, 10, and Jaimi, 12, and their son Gary, 16. George called for the intake interview. He said that his son was in trouble for stealing and dealing drugs. Gary is on probation, and the court ordered him to undergo therapy. It was suggested that the entire family be involved in some kind of family therapy.George is following the suggestion of the court and involving the entire family in counseling sessions. However, he does not have much hope that therapy will be of great help. According to him, the one who is responsible for the family’s problems is his wife, who, he says, is an alcoholic. George, a businessman who does a great deal of traveling, is convinced that he is doing all he can to hold the family together. He comments that he is a good provider and that he does not understand why Gail insists on drinking. He feels that Gary has gotten everything that he ever wanted, and he maintains that the young people of today are “just spoiled rotten.” The father says that his eldest daughter, Jaimi, is the best one of the bunch, and he has no complaints about her. He sees her as being more responsible than his wife as well as being more attentive to him. He views his younger daughter, Jessie, as pampered and spoiled by her mother, and he has little hope for her.  George is willing to give family counseling a try and says he hopes that the therapist can straighten them all out. He says that he, Gail, and Jessie are all willing to come in for a family session. Jaimi does not want to attend, however, because she says she has no problems and sees no purpose in therapy for herself. Gary is very reluctant to appear, even for one session, because he feels sure that the others in the family will see him as the source of their problems. To satisfy the conditions of his probation, Gary would rather choose “the lesser of two evils” and see a therapist privately.The counselor who did the intake interview saw only the father for an initial session. He suggests that you see the entire family for at least one session and then decide how to proceed.Questions for Reflections: (Briefly and thoroughly answer the following:  (Copy each question and respond).  Be sure to cite your work.1. What are your initial reactions after reading the intake interview? What are the themes that interest you the most in this case? Why?2. How would you proceed as a family therapist in an initial session if you saw the entire family? What issues would you want to discuss with this family at the first meeting?3. George does not seem very open to looking at his role in contributing to the problems within his family. If you were to see him as your client, how would you go about establishing a relationship with him?4. If you believed in the value of seeing the family as a unit for one or more sessions, how might you go about getting the entire family to come in? Assume that all agreed to attend one session. What would be your focus, and what would you most want to achieve in this family session?5. What are the key dynamics of the family as a system? What does the family atmosphere seem like?6. Do you see any aspects of yourself in this case? Can you identify with any of the family members? How do you think this similarity or dissimilarity would help or hinder you in working with this family?7. Show how you would work with this family, and discuss any problems that you might expect to encounter. Say how you would deal with these problems.Social SciencePsychology